5/13/2023 0 Comments Keras francois chollet![]() I’ve tried here to walk through some of what I’d consider the standard arguments in this debate as they bear on Chollet’s statements.Īs a meta-level point, I hope everyone agrees that an invalid argument for a true conclusion is still a bad argument. I am led to hope that Chollet is perhaps somebody who believes in abiding by the rules of a debate process, a fan of what I’d consider Civilization and if his entry into this conversation has been met only with braindead arguments and insults, he deserves a better reply. An intellectual superpower is the ability to consider every new idea as if it might be true, rather than merely checking whether it confirms/contradicts your current views.Ĭhollet’s essay seemed mostly on-point and kept to the object-level arguments. If you post an argument online, and the only opposition you get is braindead arguments and insults, does it confirm you were right? Or is it just self-selection of those who argue online?ĭon’t be overly attached to your views some of them are probably incorrect. In response to critics of his essay, Chollet tweeted: ![]() This is a reply to Francois Chollet, the inventor of the Keras wrapper for the Tensorflow and Theano deep learning systems, on his essay “ The impossibility of intelligence explosion.” ![]() A reply to Francois Chollet on intelligence explosion ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |